Naturist - nudism, progressive - naturist - nudism*, (* which requires a limimitlessly progressive sensorial - sensitive, psychic - emotional, mental - intellectual, transcendental, and trans-substantial personological - socialogical adherence - adaptation to higher & higher artistic - scientific - spiritual levels, and in this extent it is morally - judicially unreprovable) is a paradoxical phenomenon in the sense, that it requires an above the average "inner work" (Erich Fromm) from its active cultivators, and from its passive spectators as well. By what right are the naturist - nudists entitled to claim "higher than above the average" or even perpetually higher & higher cultural adherence - adaptation levels in their more & more wide & wider social surroundings ??? And vica - versa. By what right are the denatured - vestisists (vestis = clothes, vestisist = a person, who is addictively dependent on clothes) entitled to hinder, to stop the cultural maturation process of their fellow brothers, the civilizational evolution process of the humankind ??? Such a "narcissistically" (Erich Fromm) motivated hinderance is against the "universal interest of humankind". Again the creationism vs. evolutionism conflict, only in just another respect. As I recall to my mind, there was a famous judicial verdict in the United States about the "creationism vs. evolutionism debate", and on the benifit of the latter. Am I right? If that's the case, (following the rules of the "case - law") that's the naturists who should be accepted as the cultural pattern of normality - sanity - purity - morality - venerability, and the vestisists should or could or might be tolarated, or expulsed. Poor perspective to the moral - fundamentalist denatured - vestisists, who are alienated from the Nature to such an extent, that they cannot take off their clothes, and thus open themselves to the Nature's primordial elements: to the air, the water, the sunlight. Even higher & higher ecological awareness - consciousness levels aren't achievable without not having more & more penetrative - comprehensive sensorial - sensitive, psychic - emotional, and thus mental - intellectual, spiritual - trascendental experiences with respect to the Nature. The ecological global crisis is the reflection of our collective inner personological - socialogical, moral - judicious state. Which is more & more undeniably awful. So there is no reasonable cause for the conservative protectionist preservation concerning the public moral & judicious pathological - pathogenic sensitivity (ecological schizophrenia), the "narcissistic collectivism" (Erich Fromm).